A week ago the governors of Virigina and Maryland along with Sens. Chuck Grassley and Mitch McConnell wrote letters to AG Garland asking him to do something about protests at the homes of Supreme Court Justices. Gov. Hogan and Gov. Youngkin’s joint letter pointed to Title 18, Section 1507 of the U.S. Code which makes it illegal to protest at the home of a judge and asked Garland to “enforce the law as it is written.” Today, Garland finally spoke up:
Attorney General Merrick Garland Wednesday condemned rising threats targeting Supreme Court justices amid continuing protests over a leaked draft opinion that would overturn the landmark abortion decision Roe v. Wade.
Following a meeting with federal law enforcement officials including the Supreme Court’s chief security official, Garland said authorities would “take all appropriate actions to further enhance the security of justices and the court.”…
“The rise of violence and unlawful threats of violence directed at those who serve the public is unacceptable and dangerous to our democracy,” Garland said. “I want to be clear: while people vote, argue, and debate in a democracy, we must not – we cannot – allow violence or unlawful threats of violence to permeate our national life.”
“The Justice Department will not tolerate violence or threats of violence against judges or any other public servants at work, home, or any other location.”
A DOJ press release clarifies who was at the meeting today:
Those joining the Attorney General at the meeting included U.S. Marshals Service Director Ron Davis, FBI Deputy Director Paul M. Abbate, U.S. Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley, Supreme Court Police Chief Paul Coleman, and Counselor to the Chief Justice Jeff Minear.
Why exactly did it take a full week for Garland to call this meeting? Even if he wasn’t paying attention to the protests at Justices’ homes, he must have noticed the letters from governors and leaders in congress. It’s probably not a coincidence that earlier today an internal DHS reports indicated there was a possibility of violence if and when Roe is overturned.
The U.S. government is bracing for a potential surge in political violence once the Supreme Court hands down the ruling that’s expected to overturn Roe v. Wade, according to a Department of Homeland Security memo obtained by Axios.
The big picture: Law enforcement agencies are investigating social-media threats to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their clerks, as well as attacks targeting places of worship and abortion clinics.
That report offers the only real detail I’ve seen about the nature of the threats. Burning down the Supreme Court and killing justices and their clerks certainly seems pretty extreme. But no word on threats aimed at the justices’ homes. I wonder if Garland heard about other threats today that haven’t been made public yet?
The Axios story said the threats came from both sides, and presumably threats to clinics were from the right and threats to places of worship were from the left. Fox’s Peter Doocy asked about threats against the Supreme Court building itself and against the justices during today’s White House press briefing. Were those threats coming from the left or the right? He got a very both-sides answer from Karine Jean-Pierre.
Doocy: “DHS is worried if Roe v Wade is overturned there could be violence against the Supreme Court … are these threats from pro-abortion activists or anti-abortion activists?”
Jean-Pierre refuses to answer, instead saying that “protests have been peaceful to date.” pic.twitter.com/2Mf6jAut0N
— Washington Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) May 18, 2022